• Look Back In History
• Pmessages
• Quiz
• Stump The Staff
• Top Fifty
• Close

New Message from Jake: Nov. 20, 2009

Posted: Nov 24th 2009 By: mikeiles

NEWS!!/BREAKING NEWS!! A MUST READ FOR ALL!
NEWS ALERT!!/EVEN MORE EMPHASIS TO READ!!
NEWS FLASH!!/RAISE THE NEED ANOTHER NOTCH!!

But here is what we don't see. How about: could be news, might be news, unqualified news, unverified news, lets drop a name news, (that way somebody will read our stuff,) future news (it could happen) and one that really reeks , the DUNG news...

The problem with news is those that write it. And the lack of honesty, and time exploring the truth. Unfortunately those who do the news, seldom check what they are doing, by comparing it to the truth. After all no, penalties exist for those who are writing. The penalty is dealt to those that they write about. The damage is done regardless of the truth and this really stinks. I have a theory, and it's really simple. If those reporting were held accountable for their mistakes, half-truths and lies, the world would be in dire need of reporters. And possibly start getting bona fied news, that would really be worth reading. Don't take this wrong, but if this offends you, chances are it should.

Wouldn't it be nice to have a site that runs the truth. Not afraid to stand by their work. I would read that daily. By the way, have you ever seen a good news site? In this day and time, we all seem only to enjoy reading the bad news. There's plenty of that out there, but why not speak the truth?

Case in point. Here's what is really biting me. I have read several posts on several sites recently the report that I have no-showed (here we go again.....) a show of some kind, where I was invited to promote my DVD, WHICH DVD I am not sure, and here is why. I was not invited, contacted, contracted, and did not receive any subliminal thoughts, pertaining to any requested appearance to the aforementioned promotion. It simply did not happen. How insane would it be not to sell my own product? Almost as insane as those who are printing that it was reputed that I refused to be involved.

http://wrestling.insidepulse.com/2009/11/12/update-on-2010-hall-of-fame-class/comment-page-1/

http://www.tblwrestling.com/2009/11/15/potential-names-for-wwes-hall-of-fame-class-of-2010/

http://www.wrestling-edge.com/wwe-news/update-on-the-2010-wwe-hall-of-fame-class-new-names-warrior.html

http://www.thescoreboards.com/forums/showthread.php?t=106949

http://www.wordofsouth.com/myblock/showthread.php?p=1566263

http://www.pwrshow.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=6516:update-on-the-2010-wwe-hall-of-fame-class-new-names-warrior-news&catid=31:headlines&Itemid=22

http://www.yardbarker.com/wwe/articles/Update_on_the_2010_WWE_Hall_of_Fame_Class_New_Names_Warrior_News/1553264

http://www.impactwrestling.com/Content.aspx?ID=30040

http://www.sescoops.com/wwe-news/wwe-hall-of-fame-class-of-2010-list-of-rumored-names

http://www.wrestlingforum.com/general-wwe/478739-rumoured-names-2010-wwe-hall-fame-3.html

http://www.wordofsouth.com/myblock/showthread.php?p=1566853

P.S. Why not speak to the horse's head, instead of the horse's ass?
And people wonder why I don't do more interviews. And unfortunately, they might be credible journalists.

Jake

Tags: Jake Roberts